I recently watched the Burton/deHavilland as well as the
2017 film versions of the story, and give them both 4 stars (-1 for changes
from the text). The recent release, starring Rachel Weisz, after a whopping 2
days in our local theaters, is finally on cable PPV. Gripping. There's a
subtext in the story that's not quite so misogynistic : think of England, wild
nature uncontrolled (Devonshire moors), Ambrose and Phillip, as
"masculine" forces in society, and think of Italy, nature somewhat
tamed (the courtyard), or certainly ancient and primal (herbalism, often
associated w the female spiritual force), Rachel, and her BGF Rinaldi, as
"feminine". Imagine yourself as a 19th century woman w no right to
vote, own property, control your own financial destiny or even your own body.
Then ask yourself : What do I do to survive? How do I do it? (Rachel is just an
earlier more subtle version of Scarlett O'Hara.) The novel brings this idea
clearly into focus at the end -Rachel is attempting to build an Italian style
garden in the English landscape, which ultimately destroys her. Western
capitalism dominates romanticized tropical culture. Male power wins over
female.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jun/17/rereading-my-cousin-rachel-daphne-du-maurier
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.